of GMO is purposefully misleading. Did you check out who produced some of the amazing findings? http://www.dcscience.net/2006/07/19/institute-of-science-in-society/ Leaky intestines sounds awful...
https://www.dcscience.net/2006/07/19/institute-of-science-in-society/comment-page-1/#comment-15218
@Bud
Gilbert Ling's work is old and it's thoroughly discredited. If you look at modern work on the structure of water, you'll find that water does indeed have some structure but the es...
https://www.dcscience.net/2006/07/19/institute-of-science-in-society/comment-page-1/#comment-15114
With all due respect, your comments about the issues involving the 4th phase of water and why Mae-Wan Ho and her colleagues are writing about the aspects of homeopathy which can be explained b...
https://www.dcscience.net/2006/07/19/institute-of-science-in-society/comment-page-1/#comment-15112
It's now 11 years since I wrote that, and I guess the honest answer is that I have no recollection at all of what I meant.
I was (and still am) pretty angry with Monsanto who gave GM ...
https://www.dcscience.net/2006/07/19/institute-of-science-in-society/comment-page-1/#comment-15061
David, when you mentioned in an early paragraph that you saw much to agree with in this respect regarding ISIS, were you referring to their anti-GM nonsense or something else?
https://www.dcscience.net/2006/07/19/institute-of-science-in-society/comment-page-1/#comment-15060
*I just came across this but Mae-Wan Wo has a fairly new article (2013, 'the new genetics' ) in the journal Entropy (mdpi.com/journal entropy) (an 'iffy' journal but some respectable peopl...
https://www.dcscience.net/2006/07/19/institute-of-science-in-society/comment-page-1/#comment-14815
Glad you like me like to keep an open mind!
I agree there seem to be different standards for some things than others! eg I get the impression with chemicals and gm materials the safety s...
https://www.dcscience.net/2006/07/19/institute-of-science-in-society/comment-page-1/#comment-14565
Just about anything could be true. Luckily for patients, you are required to produce good evidence that your idea actually is true before you can sell it to patients. Well that ...
https://www.dcscience.net/2006/07/19/institute-of-science-in-society/comment-page-1/#comment-14561
HI tx again for quick reply. there are 2 issues, we need to be careful not to conflate them.
1. whether there *could* be a mechanism for something that is highly diluted to still ret...
https://www.dcscience.net/2006/07/19/institute-of-science-in-society/comment-page-1/#comment-14558
I'm afraid that the "mechanisms" that they discuss for homeopathy are sheer made-up (pseudo)science. Once you have a bit scientific background, it's easy to use long sciencey-sounding words ...
https://www.dcscience.net/2006/07/19/institute-of-science-in-society/comment-page-1/#comment-14556
HI thanks for the quick reply and glad I found your site there is some interesting stuff there for sure. Yes the i-sis site does exist and creates a plethora of interesting looking articles th...
https://www.dcscience.net/2006/07/19/institute-of-science-in-society/comment-page-1/#comment-14551
Thanks for your comment. It's the first in the eight years since this was posted. Since then I've heard nothing about the Institute or its founder for years now. I don't even know whether it...
https://www.dcscience.net/2006/07/19/institute-of-science-in-society/comment-page-1/#comment-14545
HI thanks for your review of the i-sis site. I am interested in any more info on the articles you mentioned as all that was said is that they are eg barmy and nonsense without any published cr...
https://www.dcscience.net/2006/07/19/institute-of-science-in-society/comment-page-1/#comment-14543