In reply to markus. sry, its 2am in the morning in Germany and I just realized my English grammar skills are gone.
http://clean-cpp.org/algorithms-vs-manual-loops/#comment-201
In reply to Mike Basille. This Post has been part of a series. The 'final form' of the example can be found here. http://...
http://clean-cpp.org/algorithms-vs-manual-loops/#comment-200
http://clean-cpp.org/test-driven-development/
In reply to Michel. Agreed, this article is talking more about "fakes" as opposed to "mocks". See Martin Fowler's definitions here: ht...
Unit tests follow a simple pattern. First, you create a controlled environment for the function or class you want to test. Afterwards, you call a function or method of an object or create a new ...
http://clean-cpp.org/test-driven-development/
This article was very informative. Can you also explain how an object can be tested to make sure its destructor was called and there are no dangling pointers remaining.
Mock objects - http://clean-cpp.org/mock-objects/
Moving a string is almost free; it merely assigns the values of the source s data members to the corresponding data members of the target. In contrast, copying a string requires the allocation of...
http://clean-cpp.org/assignment-operators-in-cpp11/#comment-141
In reply to vpostman. What you mention is a perfect use of the 90s C++ (before I wrote a line in it :)). But the language...