(CSS). Ska man då följa dessa rekomendationer eller inte? Efter att ha läst ett inlägg av Mike Davidson på hans blogg ändrade jag min åsikt. I början var jag mycket noga ...
https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2004/06/march-to-your-own-standard#comment-39528
to semantically describe content. Once mastered, the web developer is able to make intelligent and conscious decisions on the “right” compromises to be made for a given project. We are const...
https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2004/06/march-to-your-own-standard#comment-34395
- Is this the blog you were thinking of with the "intentionally invalid" badge"? Mike Davidson - March to Your Own Standard __________________ Jay Thompson Thesis Sites: Phoenix Real Estate Guy ...
https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2004/06/march-to-your-own-standard#comment-34130
Secondly, opacity is a CSS 3 property, so your stylesheet will not validate. On a lighter note, I honestly don't think your stylsheets should necessarily validate. I'd rather my site works like ...
https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2004/06/march-to-your-own-standard#comment-32741
a discussion on web standards, I cited an article on Mike Davidson’s blog. Someone disagreeing with the points I raised retorted with: You can’t really refer to
https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2004/06/march-to-your-own-standard#comment-32690
More Reading…
https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2004/06/march-to-your-own-standard#comment-32688
Marko Karppinen’s study assumes that validity has anything to do with standards-based design, which it clearly does not.
https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2004/06/march-to-your-own-standard#comment-32284
I don’t care. Officially. I’ve taken precedent (kind of) from Mike Davidson, and am purposefully leaving my site erroneous(in some eyes). Just to let everyone know, I’ll
https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2004/06/march-to-your-own-standard#comment-32239
Have you run it through the W3C HTML and CSS Validators? Whether you believe in standards or make a great argument for breaking them, the W3C validators are still a great way to catch minor erro...
https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2004/06/march-to-your-own-standard#comment-32196
your web site is broken.” “Meh, read this.” “Um, but your site is broken in stupid, careless and lazy ways. You’re not
https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2004/06/march-to-your-own-standard#comment-31527
code to check if there are any errors in it. But even though you validate it, its not always valid. Check this article about making your own
https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2004/06/march-to-your-own-standard#comment-31213
11th, 2007 You know, for some reason this guy makes a whole lot of sense. Mike Davidson - March to Your Own Standard You know all the rules, but only through trial-and-error will you learn all o...
https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2004/06/march-to-your-own-standard#comment-30552
I agree with most peoples views on the matter, validation is a very useful tool in the debugging of webpages. Validation has its uses, I just think its important that these uses be recognised. Th...
https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2004/06/march-to-your-own-standard#comment-59
Ouch, I wrote a long bit. So, I put it online in my weblog, but for your viewing pleasure I'll also paste here: Mike Davidson https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2004/06/march-to-your-own-standard#comment-53
You made some very interesting points here and you're right--in some cases validation becomes its' own purpose, which shouldn't be. My oppinion is that pages should be valid, but you made me thin...
https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2004/06/march-to-your-own-standard#comment-52