Comme il l’a noté Nadia Bernaz, professeur de droit à l’Université de Wacheningen aux Pays-Bas, « Le cœur de la plainte est que l’entreprise a vendu le composant à Israël en sachant...
v. RTZ and Lubbe v. Cape, and the UK Supreme Court confirmed this in Vedanta v. Lungowe. …. This holding thus staves off the fears that transnational corporate duties of care are a
some of cases settled before trial or struck out for various other reasons, some others such as Lungowe v Vedanta and Choc v Hudbay Minerals, are still being litigated in English and Canadian Co...
https://rightsasusual.com/?p=1419
would do well to look at the detailed analysis of the case by Dr Lucas Roorda on the Rights as Usual blog: “Wading through the (polluted) mud: the Hague Court of Appeals rules on Shell in
on Professor Ruggie’s legacy and impact can be found in the testaments of Arabesque, Nadia Bernaz and . Many more will follow in the days and weeks to come. I relate to Nadia Bernaz where she ...
https://rightsasusual.com/2021/09/19/remembering-prof-john-ruggie/comment-page-1/#comment-55
Parallel litigation in the Netherlands has taken over a decade, culminating in the recent decision of the Dutch Court of Appeal which found Shell liable for pollution of two Nigerian
Parallel litigation in the Netherlands has taken over a decade, culminating in the recent decision of the Dutch Court of Appeal which found Shell liable for pollution of two Nigerian
Parallel litigation in the Netherlands has taken over a decade, culminating in the recent decision of the Dutch Court of Appeal which found Shell liable for pollution of two Nigerian
Parallel litigation in the Netherlands has taken over a decade, culminating in the recent decision of the Dutch Court of Appeal which found Shell liable for pollution of two Nigerian